Sunday, October 14, 2012
Revenge is set at the center of the play and drives the characters' actions while adding to the exciting events in the play, this does not mean that Hamlet is a revenge play as some have argued. This is for instance confirmed by the fact that Hamlet has no need to investigate the cause of his father's death as his father's ghost communicated with him the nature of the events surrounding his murder. Hamlet does not need to search for the identity of the murdered as he knows its his uncle. The only obstacles in his way of revenge are ones he creates himself through hesitation, self-doubt, and indecisiveness. he manages to avenge his father's death at the end, he does so at the expense of the lives of his mother, the girl he loves, her father, brother, and himself. The agony of the closing scenes could have been avoided had Hamlet been able to take action and avenge his father. It are these particular facts which transform Hamlet into a tragedy of both the individual as well as the state. Hamlet is a very melancholic and tragic person. He contemplates death and his own suicide at several instances in the play. Also, he does not seem to be particularly content with his family or himself. This unhappiness with the external world is clear through his unfavorable outlook on his mother's marriage with his uncle Claudius. It is thereby also clear through his harsh repudiation of his love, Ophelia. In this context, it is interesting to observe how Hamlet's words seem often to indicate a general disgust and mistrust of women. the Prince of Denmark appears little concerned with the state of affairs in Denmark and his actions reflect throughout the play the worsening state of the nation. Hamlet can be summarized as a philosophical, melancholic, hesitant, intellectual, and destructively rash and impulsive character who indulges in his own selfish desires at several instances in the play, at the expense of himself and those around him which eventually contributes to the tragedy of not only himself but also of the state of Denmark.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hey Miguel, I agree with your analysis of Hamlet as being both a tragedy of the state and of him personally. I also agree that the tragedy he creates is of his own doing. His outright obsession with assuring Claudius that he is aware of what he has done to the King and not necessarily, to outright revenge his death is quite strange. I also agree that he appears to have issues with women, which is probably accurate for the times. I also agree that the death of all the players due to Hamlet’s blind obsession with revenge will have a severe impact on the future state of Denmark.
ReplyDeleteMiguel,
ReplyDeleteThough revenge is the point of view for most of the main characters(i.e The King and Hamlet), we should also explore the possibility of jealousy. Both Claudius and Hamlet display jealousy within the narrative. Claudius was jealous of his brother's accomplishment as King of Denmark, With all my heart, and it doth much content me to hear him so inclined"
(1395).
Claudius was also jealous of the relationship the former King, Jove, had with the his wife. "Th'imperial jointress to this warlike state , have we as 'twere with a defeated joy" (1361). This passage infers that through his action and jealousy, Claudius is able to inherite his brother's fortune.
Claudius was jealous of what his brother had; success as King, an heir to the throne; Hamlet, and a wife who was groomed to be queen. Claudius' envy led him to kill his brother as a way of gaining control. Killing his brother was the "ultimate" sin based on the Bible and Christianity. Jealousy and revenge between Claudius and his brother is biblically noted as the story of Cain and Abel.
When the former King, father of Hamlet, returns as a ghost his spirit engages Hamlet. The former King wants revenge against his perpetrator, his own brother Claudius.
The Ghost plays the most significant role in revealing lust, jealousy and revenge within the story of Hamlet, which leads to the ultimate demise of Denmark.
I agree with you that Hamlet could have ended this whole tragedy from the beginning. If he just killed Claudius the first chance he got, then him and his loved ones would still be alive. However, I believe he hesitates because he does not want to be a murderer. He also thought because Claudius asks for forgiveness he will go to heaven, and Hamlet does not want to send him there. So he waits for Claudius to commit another sin in order for him to burn in hell. Hamlet decides it is Claudius’ time to die when he kills his mother.
ReplyDelete